Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Julia Peters's avatar

Love your story. I’m also intrigued with why memories don’t match facts. I have theorized that the brain “files” all thoughts at night while we sleep. And that it can’t “file” an incomplete thought or event, so it sometimes just makes up an “ending”. I think that may lead to explaining dreams, good and bad. And why they seem to have some reality and some craziness in the same dream. Your theory adds new a dimension to my musings. I’m 73, and still try to “figure things out”. Like why put the period inside the quotation marks when the period is not part of the thought. :/

P.S. I may have read about brain filing long ago and now think it was my theory. So I may be a liar. I hate that!

Expand full comment
David Roy's avatar

Memory is indeed an interesting thing, but largely misunderstood.

If I can be provocative, there is no absolute truth in any memory. In fact there is no such thing as absolute truth but one’s own. All what we call truth is merely relative truth: how we collectively agree on how things were. As long as we say “yesterday happened”, yesterday happened! But in reality, we don’t know.

.

Have I confused you yet?! Well, such is the nature of memory. It’s really tricky and can be devastating to one's psyche and wellbeing if one doesn't understand the underlying mechanism.

.

Each person views a phenomenon differently and consequently, stamps it in memory differently. So by the time we recall the memory, it can never be one-to-one as the experience itself. It's like when you ask a couple how they met. By the time each is done with their version you wonder if they ever met in the first place.

.

Every time we recall something we automatically censor which detail will come to the forefront and which will be discarded, depending on the situation that called for the recalling of the memory. And we do it subconsciously. The memory plays within us. In essence, what we know as ourselves is just a consequence of the memory that is stored within us, which is largely not in our access but it is playing out in its own way. So memory is hugely empowering on one level but it is also a buffer; a boundary line.

.

When it comes to our history, which is a collection of stories ("his story"), it shows that we can never really know how things really were, because they are a sum-total of memories recalled individually, but also manipulated by the memory itself. That's why the more sophisticated we become in the way we gather and store information, the more "versions of history" popup, which inadvertently messes us up.

.

The caveat here is that it was never the point to begin with. The point, at least in my view, is to understand the underlying mechanism, because then one can liberate themselves of the ordeal of clinging onto the past.

.

People have a hard time letting go of the need to search for the truth, while in fact, whatever they look for can only be a relative truth; the collection of agreements society has chosen to agree upon on how things were. In other words, the story that is not factual is as important as a story that is. Because the added value lies in the storytelling itself.

.

That's why movies, documentaries and news can never be an exact representation of history. And yet, they still serve an important contribution to the enhancement of our collective intelligence. The more variety we’re exposed to; the more angles and different ways of seeing things, the more our cognitive potential is heightened and ultimately, our awareness.

.

All these memories put us together. However, identifying with them is what disturbs us.

.

Thank you for an interesting and emotionally moving read.

Expand full comment
37 more comments...

No posts